An Animal Equality investigation published in August 2026 alleges serious animal-welfare failures across six pig farms in Santa Catarina, Brazil’s leading pork-producing state. The organization says its footage and recordings document injured animals without veterinary care, painful procedures performed without pain relief, and rough handling during loading.
The findings are allegations supported by evidence collected and released by an advocacy organization. They are not a final court judgment. Animal Equality has filed a civil action seeking accountability, and a public case listing shows that the matter was distributed to a court in Chapecó on August 27, 2026.
What the investigation says it documented
Animal Equality says investigators visited six farms: two linked to Aurora Coop, one linked to Coperaguas, and three operated by independent producers. One of the independent operations was described as connected to a regional pig-farming cooperative.
According to the organization, the material includes pigs with untreated injuries and illnesses, sows kept in gestation crates, and newborn piglets whose teeth and tails were cut without pain-control medication. At a farm linked to Coperaguas, the group says a pig with broken legs was forced to walk so the animal could later be loaded for slaughter.

The organization also alleges that workers kicked pigs and used electric prods while loading them onto trucks. On an independent farm, it says a sow that had miscarried was left without prompt veterinary attention while the bodies of her piglets remained nearby.
A lawsuit has been filed, but no final ruling has been reported
Animal Equality announced that it filed a lawsuit against companies and people associated with the investigated farms. A public court-tracking record identifies Animal Equality Brasil and an animal-lawyers association among the plaintiffs, with Aurora and Coperaguas among the defendants. The case record confirms that legal proceedings were opened; it does not establish that every allegation has already been proven in court.
The organization points to Article 225 of Brazil’s Constitution, which prohibits practices that subject animals to cruelty, and Article 32 of the Environmental Crimes Law, which penalizes animal mistreatment. It also says Brazil’s 2020 normative instruction on pig welfare contains recommended practices rather than a complete mandatory welfare code for producers.
Corporate welfare commitments and the need for scrutiny
Aurora publishes animal-welfare commitments that describe farm checklists, collective housing goals for breeding sows, environmental enrichment, and alignment with recognized welfare standards. Those stated policies provide important context, but they do not by themselves resolve the specific allegations raised by the investigation.

Farm-animal welfare depends on what happens in practice: prompt veterinary treatment, appropriate housing, humane handling, staff training, and effective oversight. When credible footage raises concerns, authorities and companies should investigate the evidence transparently and publish the outcome.
The accurate conclusion at this stage is that Animal Equality has documented and legally challenged what it describes as severe mistreatment at six farms. Responsibility for any legal violation remains for the courts and relevant authorities to determine.
Sources
- Animal Equality Brasil: investigation announcement, August 27, 2026.
- Animal Equality: English-language investigation summary, September 19, 2026.
- Public court-tracking record for case 5025956-25.2026.8.24.0018.
- Aurora Coop: animal-welfare commitments.
